Experts fall out over Van Gogh’s “last painting”
Well how about this comment below only one day later.
vanrijngo says; Hey you MFA so-called experts, you had better all fall-in instead of out,.... and listen up! I'm all about finding truths, and when there are supposedly no more truths to be found or discovered, then my own life, such as Vincent's, is not really worth living either,... when people really don't give a shit, one way or the other, what is the real truth. I am going to show you MFA experts one last time, Vincent's very last painting of his suicide done on paper laid down on card-board, and another reverse painting done on glass representing the death-head butterfly, Vincent's own disease, his sign of death of the crow, and the location of where he had in fact shot himself.
This is the great American art challenge of mine I'm presenting to all the MFA experts, and it goghs exactly as this. In believing most really do care about Vincent, and what is real or not, one would think a painting such as the one I'll be showing the MFA experts again, with the supposed easy analysis one would believe could be possible in testing paint and paper, a person would think they might want to save this painting from being cut up into little bitty squares to be sold on eBay. Who know what those little squares would bring as being from the worlds most confrontational painting ever brought forward to MFA expert eyes and opinion.
As most all know with out this painting being signed and belonging to myself, I could pretty much do anything I wanted to do with it, since it is not accepted as to who I say and believe it to have been painted by. I could make a few hundred or so real happy to own a little piece of possibly Vincent van Gogh's last painting in history for a little bit of nothing,.... just as most the rest of his painting were sold for,..... shortly after his death. Most were sold at flea markets and house to house out of wheel carts and by disgruntled landlords who sold and gave away many that were left when locking him out of their rentals for non-payment of rent. Most were sold all over Breda and the rest of Europe, and the whole world, where ever they happened to have wound up.
I'd could say with absolute certainty that most all the MFA expertise with pretty much all their wonderful knowledge of Vincent van Gogh, and of his works of art, have very little idea of this artist Vincent van Gogh's total actual production, and if they did, the one at the Foundation and the rest of MFA expertise there would refute it to no ends. It does amazing me that this fantastic website of the Breda Art Museum and this complete article about these works of art of Vincent's went down and is no longer available to the general art public.
I am personally so mother f-n ass tired of hearing every other mother f-n ass van Gogh painting coming up for sale lately,... ones in the hopes of actually selling, and they are consider by the MFA experts, including the owners, that they are or could be Vincent's very last MFA painting he painted before he died. Well now,.. exactly how many MFA last paintings do you MFA people think and suppose Vincent van Gogh could have pumped out in those last two and a half days he was left with a bullet in his belly and bleeding internally? The fault not only belonging to the doctors, but also falls on Vincent himself, and his art dealing brother named Theo. I do believe Vincent ask his brother Theo quite a few times through those two and a half days of their visit if the doctors were going to take that bullet out of his body during Theo's stay there.
Not many really pick this true meaning out of the books of what Dr. Gachet mentioned about Vincent's last visit to his house, just before the episode of Vincent shooting himself. The Doctor might have been thanking his own lucky stars that he himself, along with his family members didn't become part of this little shooting incident. This in itself might have been the main reasoning of he and his colleague's decision of not to operate, for if they saved Vincent, he just might do something crazy later at another date and time.
So,... in taking all what was said above into consideration, how would the most of you reading this, consider and believe the true cause of Vincent's death to really be? We all know it was a self inflicted wound, but yet, not one was present at the time, or even really knows for sure where the shooting took place, except just a few,.... which was eventually disputed by the experts, for the gun was never found. That fact is very understandable when it is understood where Vincent stuffed the gun after shooting himself when he didn't die. Yes, it is a true story that Vincent did in fact shoot himself in a farm yard, and on top of the animal dung heap,... supposedly due to his own brothers Theo's abandonment, of Vincent, and also of his art,... Vincent seen no other means of support, being out of supplies, behind on everything, while seeing no reasons for wanting to go on living this way.

A picture of a time period hand gun,.. but not like the one Vincent had used, for it was probably smaller, and would have fit neatly in his front pocket. It was never found after this incident of him shooting himself,... mostly due to where they would have had to looked for it. If they would have looked in the right place, they may have found it, just as the true story had been told by some who knew, and by Vincent himself in his final works of art.
It does not take a genius mind to figure this out when reading in certain true biographies of Vincent life, his letters,... and taking into consideration of the happenings in the last few months of 1990 before Vincent shooting himself at the end of July.
Back to their story;
A portrait stashed in a bank vault in Athens could be the last painting Vincent van Gogh produced, according to some art experts and collectors who are attempting to determine the authenticity of the picture found among the possessions of a Greek world war two resistance fighter.
The discovery of the work, along with a notebook of sketches also purportedly drawn by Van Gogh, has raised the prospect of the post-impressionist artist having painted a third portrait of his physician, Dr Gachet, perhaps only days before a bout of insanity induced him to commit suicide at the age of 37. For art historians it would add to the controversy that has surrounded the famous painting by one of the fathers of modern art.
Gauguin's 1892 etching of Vincent, with crows all over his face, head, and shoulder, with a baby crow's open mouth wanting a worm from its mother, done as Vincent van Gogh's missing ear. What an asshole Gauguin really was.

The Crow, Vincent's sign of death.
“A lot of interest has been expressed in the work from very big museums and auction houses,” its owner, Doretta Peppa, said. “A well-known institution will soon make an announcement about its historical background that will leave no doubt it is an original work by Van Gogh.”

Peppa said the portrait’s colourful history began in France when the Nazis stole it from a Jewish family during the second world war. After Hitler’s forces marched into Greece in April 1941 it was brought to Athens, an exhibition centre for looted treasures.
The Athenian writer claims it was “liberated” by her father, Meletis, a prominent figure in the partisan movement, during a raid on a German train in the waning days of the occupation in 1944.
“It was not the only treasure that was liberated but understanding its particular value my father kept it stored in a safe place for years,” she said. Peppa put the painting in a bank vault after approaching the head of conservation at the Greek National Gallery who, after studying its brushwork and signature, told her she not only had an original Van Gogh in her possession but one of his rarer works.
Tests by other art experts supported the assessment. “It has gone through so many laboratory analyses that I am 100% convinced it is a Vincent van Gogh,” said Athanasios Celia, a Paris-based painter and art historian. “We have examined and dated the materials used and there is no doubt in my mind that it is unique,” he added. “As the other portraits of Dr Gachet were painted towards the end of Van Gogh’s life, it also raises the possibility that this less detailed version is the last [work] he ever produced.”
It had been thought that the Dutch-born artist painted two portraits of the physician who cared for him in the last months of his life. One belongs to the Musée d’Orsay in Paris. The other, sold by Christie’s to the Japanese industrialist Ryoei Saito for £48m in 1990, held the distinction for 14 years of being the most expensive painting sold at auction.
But in a market where Van Gogh fakes abound, questions have also been raised about the painting in Athens. In 1990 the Art Newspaper claimed that the portrait of Dr Gachet hanging in the Musée d’Orsay was a counterfeit. The plot thickened after scholars suggested the physician may have been the source of some of the forgeries. Although the authenticity of the Van Gogh notebook found with the portrait has also been questioned - the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam has discredited it - Peppa says the Nazi stamp and code on the back of the painting provides added proof of its authenticity.
As the identity of its Jewish owners has not been revealed, and no one has come forward to reclaim it, under Greek law it belongs to Peppa. Some experts have valued the work at $100m (about £50m). guardian.co.uk